I saw a sign driving into work this morning “Littering
Highway Unlawful.” I must be in the academic English world too much because my
first thought was “that is not a sentence.” I know. I’m a nerd. But, there is
something to be said for the “norm” of speech. If I think about British
literature—or, as I thought of it as a student, the old literature—the style of
writing is much different than today. In fact, I used to think that people
walked around talking Shakespearean, or at the very least in long fluffy
sentences. It wasn’t until I got to college that I started to learn the style
of writing then did not match their spoken language.
It makes sense. In dialogue, we can write the way we speak
to be “realistic,” although if an author goes too far then the “dialect”
writing becomes frowned upon. For instance, I know Huckleberry Finn is highly
proclaimed, but if he tried to publish that book today I think the
editors/agents would reject it as being too hard to read. I even remember an English
teacher saying Charles Dickens was not revered in his day because his prose was
geared too much toward the population.
What does this have to do with the sign? I started to think
about a major complaint starting about five years ago from English teachers I knew.
Students were beginning to write essays using “text” language. OMG, etc. They
weren’t capitalizing “I” anymore and there were no periods. When students didn’t
understand a problem, they would write “IDK” (I don’t know). One teacher asked if
that meant “I don’t care.” We told her maybe, but that would probably be IDC. I
thought about the sign. It dropped one word for space. Although, does “is” really
take a lot of space? We drop words for space in texting, which is becoming a
larger form of communication. I even find myself dropping words on occasion for
this blog. What’s worse is I don’t notice until I edit before posting.
So, I started wonder when/if the written word will “weaken” just as it did before. Another sign I passed said “Wrong way.” Do we really need the subject there? Or, does it work in context? In other words if you see it posted in front of a door, then the subject is implied? Maybe I’m the only one to wonder, but as authors push for authenticity, I am curious how much of our “modern” speech will ease into our novels.
Here’s one more thing to consider. Most authors are told to
write to an 8th grade reading level because that is the average. I
even read an article a few years ago that suggested it should now be the 5th
grade reading level. If we are trying to capture more and more readers to gain
a following, should we start writing the way they speak? I’m not sure how that would
look in a novel, but it kind of frightens me to think about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment